Implications of change management on organizational behavior

Implications of qualifying prudence on organizational behaviour turn is hard because people overestimate the mensurate of what they collapse-and underestimate the value of what they may gain by giving that up. (James et al 1994)Change wariness is the offshoot, tools and techniques to manage the people-side of transfigure to achieve the required business offcome (Prosci 2009). This melodic theme fall outlines a massive Change Management exercise rol take out at Infosys Technologies Ltd (ITL), India. ITL is a NASDAQ tended fortune 500, Indian IT company with 63 offices across the globe with an employee base of 1, 22,468 (Infosys 2010).Pre-recession scenario in Indian IT companies witnessed employee promotions in every 2-3 geezerhood. As a result, a person works on technology for 4-5 years and then moves up to management. This has resulted in clients complaining about the lack of technically strong people. To urgency to meet the client expectations triggered the launch of iRACE (Infosys Role and life story Enhancement) swap management exercise in October 2009 amidst peak recession temper (Huczynski et al 2010 pp. 563). iRACE, implemented by global HR services fast Mercer Consulting, was a career geological fault exercise with 24 career streams to understand the growth go out no longer be defined by movement up due to frequent promotions. This review sights the abstract of the reputation of iRACE mutation using weighing machine Of Change and Change Leadership musical mode plot (Stace and Dunphy, 2001), alteration agents approach, converse strategy and implications of iRACE swap and compares it with theory. Also suggestions that could subscribe led to effective flip-flop management at Infosys with minimum tube and impact on the employees have been proposed.Change characteristics Scale, Leadership mood consideration AnalysisWith approx. 1, 00,000 employees getting affected by the iRACE change rollout the analysis of the scale, lead ers port context of the change becomes very signifi nookyt. Stance and Dunphy (2001) defined that the change of scale using quaternion characteristics fine Tuning, incremental ad averagement, modular transformation and corporate transformation. Stance and Dunphy (2001) also defined the categories of change leadership path collaborative, consultative, directive and coercive. Plotting Scale Of Change against Change Leadership course and Dunphy Stace calamity approach to change implementation helps to analyze the scale of change, leadership style and evaluate the approach of iRACE change whether it fits in the right context or not . (Huczynski et al 2010 pp. 574).Fig1 Scale of change and leadership styleScale of changeStyle of change leadershipFine Tuningincremental AdjustmentModularTransformationCorporate TransformationCollaborative eccentric person 1Type 2ConsultativeParticipativeevolutionCharismatictransformationDirectiveType 3Type 4iRACEChange was a necessity for survival.H ad to rely on external support for doing the change.Coercive compelevolutionDictatorial transformationSource Adopted from (Huczynski et al 2010 pp. 574).This ground substance analysis categorizes iRACE into a Corporate Change with Coercive leadership style and fits iRACE into a Dictatorial corporate transformation context.Role and approach of Change Agents in fostering the changeEffective management of change is needed to sustain the competition. Balogun and Hope Hailey (2004) report a failure rate of virtually 70% of all change programmes initiated. The facts thus suggest that there is no well-defined word formwork across domains that outlines the management and implementation of change. What is available is a wide range of confusing theories and approaches (Burnes, 2004). Guimaraes and Armstrong (1998) support this by saying that broadly speaking superficial analyses have been published in this basic area. With the lack of a fundamental framework of change, the role of chang e agents becomes exceedingly crucial.A change agent is defined as a manager who seeks to reconfigure an organizations roles, responsibilities, structures, outputs, regalees, systems, technology or other resources in the light of improving organizational effectiveness (Buchanan and Badham 1999). Buchanan and Boddy (1992) list competencies of effective change agents clarity of specifying goals, team building activities, talk skills, duologue skills and influencing skills to gain commitment to goals. Gronn (2002) and Bennett et al (2003) sight that dispersion of change theatrical means that more people need to have the skills required.Also contrasted to Gronn (2002) and Bennett et all (2003) sighting, iRACE change agency was not distributed as major break in of the change was formulated by Mercer Consulting (external change agent) and a committee of only when 65 top level managers (internal change agents)Fig2 iRACE Change Management and dialogue ( anatomys and Timelines)Sourc e Self- disposition of knowledge of iRACE gained at Infosys (2009)Kanter (1989) speaks of superhuman change agents, with wide-ranging expertise, as a business athlete. Although the change agents seemed to be effective in Phase I but contrary to Kanter (1989) argument, change agents in Phase II couldnt perform effective organizational diagnosis and Phase III IV were ineffective because of the lack of expertise the change agents took much longer condemnation than expected in dealing with the design complexities. This resulted in excessive check up on in (Phase V) and thus frustrateed conference led to mismatch with the stakeholders expectations of the change resulting in resentment of the stakeholders (Kubler Ross, 1969).Importance of Communication- An underestimated pictureAn effective communication smoothens the economy of the change. Bovee and Thill (2000, p.4) believe that effective communication only takes place when participants achieve a shared understanding, stimulate o thers to take actions and encourage people to think in new ways. Opposite to Bovee and Thills (2000) saying iRACE change communication lacked shared understanding at the managerial level.Gibb (1961) argues the importance of Communication Climate. Contrary to Gibb (1961) argument the mood was not favorable for iRace change with global recession cloud, layoffs and other strict policy amendments (e.g. 9.15 work hour policy, ISTAFF policy) and communications taking place simultaneously. The communication process also lacked effective communication strategy. The communication was merely ground on tactical analysis. Even though communication take ond just tactical analysis, It failed to cater to all the areas of tactical analysis i.e. it lacked right bring for communication flow, timeliness and efficient monitoring. Communication was made highly complex. The endure in design phase worsened the communication by percolating the delay in delivery phase and as a result of shrinked timeli nes, communication process lacked two-way communication, dialogue and feedback, review exercise for the communication delivered and decision but not the least the employee discomfort went unheard during the entire communication phase (Huczynski et al 2010 pp. 226-27).Fall out of the Change Impact on organisational Behavior Role Restructuring Demotions Over 4,500 people got demoted because of the iRACE implementation. This created a furor. spillage of Loyalty of Employees The employees criticized iRACE and the HR leadership through use of social media to run their resentment and the fading out loyalty.Unprecedented Attrition- A key failure indicator In the initial half of 2010-Infosys lost 4000 employees in the month of February 2010 alone accounting for 3% of its total strength (Dexter 2010).Over 10,000 that have quit since October 2009, 4,000 left in February10 alone.About 1,000 e-separations were filed on the intranet on a single day December 31st (Current IT Market 2010).Fig 3 Attrition lay out at Infosys Pre and Post iRACE change implementationSource (Infosys Reports Filings 2010)Pre iRACE Implementation- Q3-09 to Q2-10 relate to aggrandisement recession scenario iRACE design phase.iRACE Implementation- Q4-10 iRACE Implementation phasePost iRACE Implementation- Q1-11 to Q2-11- iRACE fall out phase.Refurbishing process- The Resolution Unitarist frame of reference views organization as fundamentally harmonious, co-operative structures, consisting of committed, loyal, worker-management teams that arouse harmony of purpose (Huczynski et al 2010 pp. 662-63). Ackroyd et al (1999) and Johnston (2000) identified the key features of unitarist frame of reference which use communication failures between management and employees to explain the piece of work combat. To overcome the communication failures continuous impacts, management must re-structure the communication process so that the objective of the change is communicated to the employees clearly. F irstly, using Gronn (2002) and Bennett et al (2003) theory of distribution of change agency management must involve more masterful persons in the communication thus distribute the change agency. Secondly, iRACE change agents should reconstitute the communication process by using a Strategic Planning- crisphead lettuce which outlines the strategicalal approach to communicating change ground on quartet levels of planning outlined below (Clampitt et all N.D.).Fig3 Strategic Planning iceberg lettuceSource (Clampitt et all N.D.)The Ice Berg strategic planning will benefit iRACE change agents in focusing on all four strategic approaches contextual analysis (anticipate possible resistance points), audience analysis (isolate key groups of employees that may be directly or indirectly wedged by the change) and strategic design (development of a sustainable strategy based on the outcomes of contextual and audience analysis) unlike the previous approach which center on Tactics (how to s?) only. As the market is stabilizing later the recession, substantial rewards (salary hikes, exceptional performance promotions, role progressions if not role change) can be given to the employees which will be beneficial for the employees and the organization as a whole.ConclusionThe Scale Of Change against Change Leadership Style and Dunphy Stace contingency approach helped in accessing the characteristics of the change. The analysis also uses Gronn (2002) and Bennett et al (2003) change agency distribution theory to analyze the importance of distribution of the change agency viz a viz emphasizes on competencies of effective change agents. These strategies, if used, strategically, would have led to the involvement of more competent people into the change process as change agents. Diversification of change agency if ignored like in case of ITL leads to inefficient change strategy. The unitarist frame of reference helped to identify the causes of conflict in ITL. This analysis further highlights the (Clampitt et all N.D.) Ice Berg strategic planning approach to understand the significance of strategic communication of the change and communication climate Gibb (1961) and its benefits in communicating the objective of the change. Value of the strategic communication in fostering the change, if undermined, wreaks serious threats to the organizational behavior. The solutions suggested may involve extra manpower, extra effort and time in restructuring the communication process and communicating the essence of change. Given solution may also take cost to give wage hikes initially but are competent enough to solve the problem and lead to a smoothened and sustainable organization change viz a viz improvement in organization behavior.ReferencesAckroyd, S. and Thompson, P. (1999) organizational Misbehavior. London Sage Publications.Balogun, J. and Hope Hailey, V. (2004) Exploring Strategic Change, 2nd edition (London learner Hall).Bennett, N., Wise, C. and Wood s, P. (2003) Distributed Leadership. Nottingham National College for School Leadership.Bovee, C.L. and Thill, J.V. (2000), Business Communication Today, 6th edition., Prentice-Hall, Upper bicycle seat River, NJ.Buchanan, D.A. and Badham, R. (1999), Politics and organizational change the livedexperience, Human Relations, Vol. 52 No. 5, pp. 609-29.Buchanan, D.A. and Boddy, D. (1992), The expertness of the Change Agent, Prentice-Hall, London.Burnes, B. (2004) Managing Change A Strategic Approach to Organizational Dynamics, quaternary edition (Harlow Prentice Hall).Clampitt, Phillip, G. and Berk, Laurey, R. (N.D.) Strategically Communicating Organization Change.http//www.imetacomm.com/otherpubs/pdf_doc_downloads/strat_commg_org_change_v5.pdf Accessed 28/10/2010.Current IT Market (2010). Most Viewed Posts Today Infosys to give unheard of increments.http//www.currentitmarket.net/2010/03/infosys-to-give-unheard-of-increments.html Accessed 27/10/2010.Dexternights (2010). Daily dose of Tech nology and Reviews Infosys iRace makes employees say I QUIT.http//www.dexternights.com/2010/03/20/infosys-irace-makes-employees-say-i-quit/ Accessed 27/10/2010.Gibb, J.R. (1961) Defensive Communication, Journal of Communication, 11(3) 141-48.Gronn, P. (2002) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis, Leadership Quarterly, 13(4)423-51.Guimaraes, T. and Armstrong, C. (1998) Empirically testing the impact of change management effectiveness on company performance, European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(2), pp. 74-84.Huczynski, A., and Buchanan, A. (2010) Organizational Behaviour, 7th edition. Harlow Pearson Education, pp. 563-575, 662-663.Infosys (2010). About us What We Dohttp//www.infosys.com/about/what-we-do/pages/index.aspx Accessed 23/10/2010.Infosys Reports Filings (2010). Quarterly Reports, FY 09-11 Fact Sheet Consolidated financial data Attrition.http//www.infosys.com/investors/reports-filings/quarterly-results/2010-2011/Q1/Pages/index.aspx Accessed 26/10/2010 James, A ., Belasco and Ralph, C., Stayer (1994). Flight Of The Buffalohttp//www.leadershipnow.com/changequotes.html Accessed 23/10/2010.Johnston, R. (2000) Hidden capital. In J. Barry, J.Chandler, H. Clark, R. Johnston and D. Needle (eds), Organization and Management A Critical Text. London supranational Thomson Business Press, pp. 16-35.Kanter, R.M. (1989) When Giants Learn to Dance Mastering the Challenge of Strategy. Management and Careers in the 1990s. London Simon Schuster.Kubler-Ross, E. (1969) On Death and Dying. Toronto McMillan.Prosci (2009). Proscis Change Management Webinar Serieshttp//www.change-management.com/Prosci-Webinar-Prereading-2009.pdf Accessed 23/10/2010.Stace, D., and Dunphy, D., 2001 The strategic management of corporate change, Human Relations, 46(8), pp. 905-918.